Skip to main content

Notebook Sports

Built-in advantage

CeCe Telfer of Franklin Pierce wins the 400 meter hurdles during the Division II Outdoor Track & Field Championships in Kingsville, Texas. (Rudy Gonzalez/NCAA Photos via Getty Images)


Built-in advantage

NCAA hurdler shows how the Equality Act would undermine the very thing it claims to champion

The NCAA crowned its first biologically male women’s track and field champion in late May. If Democrats in Congress have their way, it will become a far more frequent occurrence.

CeCe (formerly Craig) Telfer of New Hampshire’s Franklin Pierce University won the 400-meter hurdles at the NCAA Division II Outdoor Track and Field Championships on May 25 in Kingsville, Texas. Telfer’s time of 57.53 seconds was more than a full second faster than that of his nearest competitor.

A peek at Franklin Pierce’s track and field website says nothing about Telfer competing as a man for his first three college seasons or about his accomplishments during those years. The press release touting the Ravens’ first NCAA individual champion in any sport says nothing about Telfer being transgender, either.

According to the website, however, “Prior to joining [FPU’s] women’s team this season, Telfer was a mediocre D-II athlete who never came close to making it to nationals in the men’s category. In 2016 and 2017, Telfer ranked 200th and 390th, respectively, among D-II men” before sitting out the 2018 season.

If this narrative sounds eerily familiar, it should: Biologically male sprinter Terry Miller of Bloomfield High set a state record of 6.95 seconds in the girls’ 55 meters at Connecticut’s indoor track and field championships back in February. Miller also set meet records in the 100 and 200 at Connecticut’s outdoor championships last spring.

Like Telfer, Miller was nowhere near elite when competing against boys. After declaring himself a girl and competing as one, Miller became a champion. Unlike Miller, Telfer at least presumably underwent transitioning: The NCAA requires male athletes to suppress their testosterone levels for at least a year before they can compete as women. However, the NCAA does not have a set testosterone level that biological men competing as females cannot exceed.

This explains why, as Robert Johnson wrote for, “The fact that Telfer can change [his] gender and immediately become a national champion is proof positive as to why women’s sports needs protection.”

That fact seems to be lost on Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives: In mid-May, they unanimously voted to pass the so-called Equality Act, which would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to make “sexual orientation and gender identity” protected characteristics under federal law.

If enacted, the Equality Act would undermine protections established under Title IX, the federal law that ensures equal educational opportunities for girls and women in schools and colleges that receive federal funding. Since its passage in 1972, Title IX has greatly expanded athletic opportunities for girls and women.

Federal and state courts nationwide have held that segregating sports by sex is all but necessary to ensure that girls and women do receive equal opportunities in interscholastic athletics. Open competition with males, the courts recognized, would likely keep females on the sidelines as benchwarmers or spectators, thereby undermining Title IX’s purpose.

According to the NCAA’s transgender handbook, medical experts assert that the idea of biological male athletes having a competitive advantage over females “is not supported by evidence.” If it’s evidence the NCAA wants, it need look no further than track and field.

In an April 29 editorial for The Washington Post, former elite track athletes Doriane Coleman and Sanya Richards-Ross, along with LGBT tennis great Martina Navratilova, point out that high-school boys have consistently run faster than Olympic women’s champions. The disparity is even more pronounced in jumping events: The U.S. high-school record in the girls’ high jump is 6 feet, 4½ inches; in 2018, 50 boys in California alone jumped higher.

If such numbers won’t persuade lawmakers that letting biologically male athletes compete as women competitively disadvantages actual female athletes, it’s likely nothing will.


You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  •  SBTB's picture
    Posted: Sat, 06/01/2019 02:28 am

    If we are already putting women in combat positions (infantry, armor, field artillery, combat engineer, etc.), do you really think it won't happen in sports where war time missions and lives are not on the line?

  •  Marlene's picture
    Posted: Sat, 06/01/2019 02:39 pm

    Yes it will happen; obviously it is happening. That doesn't mean it should happen.

    Bedises, members of the military are usually working as a team, not competing.

  • AlanE
    Posted: Sat, 06/01/2019 09:48 am

    The differences between male and female go well beyond testosterone levels. Indeed, testosterone levels only begin to tell the difference, as just about every photo of CeCe Telfer in competition illustrates. The rub lies in getting people who want something else to be true (which, unfortunately, is a large portion of the influencers in this country) to acknowledge that fact. It may take a few more national championships by biological males, and a few desperate acts of furious women, to get that point across. 

    Meanwhile, the fact that biological males derive any joy whatsoever in defeating biological females in a national championship competition speaks volumes about what we accept as accomplishment. And none of it good.

  •  Marlene's picture
    Posted: Sat, 06/01/2019 02:40 pm

    1. His DNA stll says "male".

    2. Nouns have gender, people have sex.

  • RC
    Posted: Wed, 06/05/2019 02:31 pm

    My beleif is that you have to change your DNA (in every single cell) and then you will be the other sex. Body surface changes and hormone treatments do not count.  You can not impose how you feel about yourself on others.     

  • JerryM
    Posted: Sun, 06/02/2019 10:05 am

    The NCAA is obviously looking at the evidence that suits their agenda, not reality.  Testosterone is but one part of the story.  Biological males spend years developing muscle mass and bone size and density that, generally, gives them a distinct advantage over women.  How can this advantage be erased by modifying hormone levels? 

    My question is how do WE allow the NCAA (and so many other entities) get away with these demonstrably false claims.

  • AlanE
    Posted: Mon, 06/03/2019 02:12 pm

    We allow, even abet, it by continuing to pay the NCAA for attendance at their events. That presence may be either physical attendance-at the arena--or virtual--via a telecast or feed.

  • Beth
    Posted: Sun, 06/02/2019 07:54 pm

    Congratulations on writing a timely and well-researched article that is getting widely distributed via Twitter and other social media

  • DS
    Posted: Tue, 06/04/2019 12:25 pm

    Peter Spire, in his children's book People, says (not verbatim) that if man kind was homogenous, it would be a dull, boring world we live in. But with the variety that 20 or 30 years ago we used to celebrate, all of that diversity would make the world quite interesting and well worth living in if only to see all the nuances that God put in man kind. The far left would have us become homogenous, dull, and boring. God made us different from the same building blocks and to enjoy each other as they are naturally. (I could write a whole essay on this subject, and maybe I will someday, but I have other things to do, so my time here is limited.)

  • Jebby
    Posted: Sun, 12/29/2019 10:37 am

    Lol, is there anything else that needs to be said?  I'd like to see the "medical experts" who claim men do not have a competitive advantage over women in sports...I call their credentials into question.