Relations Reporting on marriage, family, and sexuality

The end of international adoption?

Family | New State Department regulations could strangle an endangered industry
by Kiley Crossland
Posted 3/02/18, 05:01 pm

New regulations and fees announced by the U.S. State Department in February could spell the end of intercountry adoptions in the United States, according to adoption advocates.

The changes, which went into effect Feb. 15, include a new $500 monitoring and oversight fee for adoptive families, as well as an increase in the cost of accreditation for adoption agencies. Most agencies, or adoption service providers (ASPs), believe their costs to attain accreditation every four years will triple under the new schedule of fees.

But the costs are not the main concern, according to Daniel Nehrbass, president of Nightlight Christian Adoptions. In requiring the new fees, he told me, adoption agencies are being forced to buy the rope that will be used to hang them.

“We aren’t going to be doing fewer adoptions [next year] because of $500,” Nehrbass said. “We will do fewer adoptions next year because of what the money is for.”

The additional dollars will fund a newly established accrediting organization called the Intercountry Adoption Accreditation and Maintenance Entity (IAAME), tasked with increasing monitoring and investigations of ASPs. The State Department argues that beefed up oversight is necessary to protect children and families.

The previous accrediting entity, the Council on Accreditation (COA), which had a significantly smaller budget and staff and used volunteers from ASPs to accomplish its work, withdrew late last year, citing differences with the State Department.

Some believe those differences were related to pressure from the State Department to take unwarranted adverse action against ASPs due to fears that intercountry adoption is riddled with corruption and abuse.

A growing group of ASPs and adoption advocates have contended IAAME does not qualify as a legal accrediting agency. A coalition of more than 80 agencies, called Save Adoptions, recently filed a complaint with the State Department’s inspector general claiming IAAME is unfit to operate under Hague Convention requirements. The investigation is ongoing.

Nehrbass conducted a straw poll of licensed ASPs after the February announcement. Of the 60 that responded, nearly half said they were uncertain about their future or planned to stop offering international adoptions due to regulations.

Chuck Johnson, president of the National Council for Adoption (NCFA), believes that without significant changes, the current posture of the State Department toward ASPs will soon bring about the end of international adoption. He told me that within the past three years, efforts to heavily regulate international adoption by the the State Department’s Office of Children’s Issues (OCI) have been “devoid of any kind of advocacy for intercountry adoption,” adding, “We have seen an absolute unwillingness to sit down with the [adoption] community.”

In September 2016, OCI chief Trish Maskew proposed a number of stricter regulations for intercountry adoptions. The regulations—which were opposed by the Obama-era Small Business Administration, COA, and a group of more than 80 adoption agencies who wrote a letter to then–Secretary of State John Kerry asking they be halted—did not go into effect because of the election of President Donald Trump. But Johnson said in the last year or so he has seen “an effort to backdoor those failed regulations into policies.”

The State Department’s announcement could be the last straw for a dwindling industry. Intercountry adoptions have continued a 13-year plummet from 22,884 children adopted by U.S. families in 2004 to an estimated 4,600 children in 2017, a nearly 80 percent drop. The number of licensed ASPs is also in decline, from more than 200 a decade ago to less than 160 now.

Maskew and others claim intercountry adoption is in decline due to corruption and abuse, necessitating stronger regulations. In recent decades, South Korea, Romania, Guatemala, China, Kazakhstan, and Russia have banned or cut back on international adoption, often citing cases of child abuse. In January, Ethiopia joined the list, banning all adoptions of Ethiopian-born children by foreigners.

But Johnson disputed that claim, arguing corruption and abuse is incredibly rare, and politics and social pressure are most often to blame for a country shutting its doors to adoption. Research by two economists at Grinnell College in Iowa supported that claim, showing, for example, that Russia ended U.S. adoptions in 2012 two weeks after the United States sanctioned some of its officials.

Johnson, Nehrbass, and others are lobbying Congress and the White House to step in and replace Maskew, reinstate COA instead of IAAME for accreditation, and move toward policies that further ethical practices without shuttering intercountry adoptions for Americans.

YouTube/Human Rights Campaign YouTube/Human Rights Campaign A screen grab from a television ad released by the Human Rights Campaign

A different kind of military campaign

The Human Rights Campaign launched a TV ad Friday trying to pressure the White House into allowing transgender individuals to serve in the military.

The ad labels President Donald Trump “impulsive” for his call to ban transgender individuals from serving and quotes military leaders who have said qualified individuals should be allowed to serve.

Last week, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis submitted a memo to the president with a recommendation for how to move forward with transgender troops. Neither the Pentagon nor the White House released the contents of the memo. Trump last summer said he would bar transgender individuals from serving in the military, but three federal court judges have since ruled against a ban, saying the military should be required to accommodate transgender troops and pay for sex-reassignment surgeries.

On Jan. 1, the Pentagon began allowing transgender individuals to enlist. Just one transgender person has made it through medical reviews, completed paperwork, and signed a contract but has not yet gone to basic training, according to the Pentagon.

The Human Rights Campaign also ran a full-page ad in USA Today and more than 32 regional papers arguing a ban on transgender troops “would hurt military readiness.”

But supporters of Trump’s policy argue just the opposite, contending the military should be allowed to deny service to individuals who cope with serious physical and psychological problems because they increase costs and impair combat effectiveness. —K.C.

Associated Press/Photo by Jeff Chiu (file) Associated Press/Photo by Jeff Chiu (file) A day camp for transgender children in El Cerrito, Calif.

Compassion or castration?

A proposed law in California would mandate that transgender foster kids have access to puberty-blocking drugs, “gender-affirming” counseling, and sex-change operations.

The measure, sponsored by Assemblyman Todd Gloria, a Democrat from San Diego, would add a section to the state’s legal code to specify that a child—or the child’s caregiver, attorney, court-appointed special advocate, or social worker—can request gender transition care. Under the law, the county child welfare agency is required to cooperate even if the biological parents oppose the treatment.

The law states that “gender affirming health care” includes interventions to “suppress the development of endogenous secondary sex characteristics” (hormone therapy) and to “align the patient’s appearance or physical body with the patient’s gender identity” (sex-reassignment surgeries).

“Children experiencing gender dysphoria need compassion, not castration,” said California Family Council CEO Jonathan Keller. “This legislation would prescribe dangerous and untested drugs for uses not approved by the [Food and Drug Administration]. California should reject ideology and respect biology. Amputating healthy body parts is not healthcare. It’s legalized child abuse.”

The bill has been assigned to a committee and will most likely get a hearing later this month. —K.C.

Testosterone-taking girl wins wrestling title

High school wrestler Mack Beggs last weekend successfully defended her state wrestling title in Texas, winning the 110-pound weight class for 6A schools. Beggs, 18, is biologically a female but identifies as a male and has been taking testosterone treatments.

Testosterone increases muscle mass and aggression in females and is therefore banned by Texas state law. But an exception exists for girls who are prescribed testosterone as a part of a medical treatment, including gender transition. Beggs asked to compete against boys, but the University Interscholastic League, which oversees public high school sports in Texas, requires students to compete as the gender on their birth certificate.

The senior from Euless Trinity High School near Dallas entered the state finals with a perfect 32-0 record and beat the same girl she wrestled last year in the finals. —K.C.

Kiley Crossland

Kiley is a WORLD Digital assistant editor and reports on marriage, family, and sexuality.

Read more from this writer

Comments

  • Brendan Bossard's picture
    Brendan Bossard
    Posted: Sun, 03/04/2018 08:07 pm

    International adoption saves many people and produces many good citizens, including four of my siblings.  It also exemplifies the spirit of borderless Christianity that God so loves.  Cruel and selfish people impede this form of immigration.

  • Amy Medina
    Posted: Mon, 03/05/2018 12:54 am

    I love international adoption, and I have four Tanzanian kids. But I would like to push back against the argument that corruption in international adoption is "incredibly rare." That is simply not true. The evidence of massive corruption in adoption in non-Hague countries is mind-blowing, and Christians should not be turning a blind eye to it. I wrote about it here: http://gilandamy.blogspot.com/2016/03/i-wish-it-wasnt-true-dark-side-of_...

    I don't know if these new DOS regulations will solve the problem or just make things worse, but something needs to be done. 

  • CHRISTINA CHRONISTER
    Posted: Mon, 03/12/2018 12:51 pm

    As an adoptive mother and advocate for ethical adoptions, I am disappointed to see yet another article written with such a clear slant in favor of agencies and disregarding the most vulnerable in adoptions - children and families (both birth and adoptive).  The corruption is real and it IS a very clear cause of the reduction in adoption numbers.  I do not think these new regulations "spell the end" of adoption - I think they are the clearest best HOPE for ethical adoptions I have seen in the last 15 years.  My take here:  http://www.adoptionintegrity.com/2018/02/13/is-it-time-to-panic/

  • Peter Allen's picture
    Peter Allen
    Posted: Sat, 03/17/2018 12:37 am

    As an adoptive parent of several international children I can say that in regard to Pre Hague Korea and Colombian adoption there was NO apparent corruption of any kind.  So why litterally throw out the baby with the bath water?? Does anyone consider how many more children are warehoused in orphages as a result of this maddnes??  Fact!  A childs RIGHT to a family precludes getting it 100% right every time.  In the meanwhile in America young single girls pop out kids left and right to “get a bigger welfare, and child support check” in their own words.  Once again, not a parents rights issue. (Think abortion)  But a child’s rights issue!  (Think two parrent adootion) Keep the proper focus PLEASE. It is all about what is best for the children... 

ADVERTISEMENT