The birth dearth

No country has ever reversed a birthrate of 1.3 or below, known as the “lowest-low fertility.” Ten countries—including Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea—have passed this point of no return. An average of one child per woman cuts a nation’s population in half in 30 years.

The map to the right shows the global pattern of fertility in 2018. Growth has dropped in virtually every nation, including sub-Saharan Africa, where the average rate in 2018 was 4.78.

In the United States, the same downward trends are at work. In January 2010, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention published “Expected Number of Births over a Woman’s Lifetime—National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1940–2018”:

“During 1940–2018, the expected number of births a woman would have over her lifetime, the TFR [total fertility rate], was highest for women during the post–World War II baby boom (births during 1946–1964). In 1957, the TFR reached a peak of 3.77 births per woman. The TFR generally declined for the birth cohort referred to as Generation X from 2.91 in 1965 to 1.84 in 1980. For the birth cohorts referred to as Millennials (Generation Y) and Generation Z, the TFR first increased to 2.08 in 1990 and then remained generally stable until it began to decline in 2007. By 2018, the expected number of births per woman fell to 1.73, a record low for the nation. Except for 2006 and 2007, the TFR has been below the level needed for a generation to replace itself (2.10 births per woman) since 1971.”

Small cities, towns, and suburbs generally support family formation and children. Larger cities have smaller families. In 2015, 25 percent of U.S. households were single-person. These realities develop political implications. Two-thirds of single women support the Democratic Party, at least in part because its platform supports abortion. A “simple” procedure allows women to be like men: to have sex and not be pregnant. On the other hand, married women with children tend to be Republicans.

Two cultural mindsets divide the United States. One side values singleness, minimal responsibilities, freedom to consume. The other treasures community, families, “being” more than “having.”

In his article, Kotkin engages the deeper philosophical, theological questions as well. What does it mean to be human? Do we have no more value than a cockroach? Are we the cancers of the earth or the stewards of creation? Consumers or creators? Can we have a hopeful future based on the existence of a beneficent Creator, or do we live in a silent universe without purpose? The answers will shape our future.

South Korea’s anti-maternal, anti-familial, and pro-death culture grew during a great evangelistic and church-planting movement.

SOUTH KOREA’S POPULATION SLIDE is even more tragic than immediately apparent. This disturbing trajectory developed during a massive push to evangelize and spread the gospel. South Korea’s anti-maternal, anti-familial, and pro-death culture grew during a great evangelistic and church-planting movement.

Many evangelicals regard as sacred, and therefore of ultimate importance, a relatively small slice of life: evangelism, church planting, Bible distribution, worship services, missionary work, etc. They relegate everything else—education, government, citizenship, family formation, vocation, the arts (obviously the list goes on and on)—to second place. Somebody needs to care for such matters, and it would be good if Christians were involved, but these concerns don’t rise to the level of first importance.

The birth dearth is a wakeup call to the church. It is not enough to do evangelism and church planting. These must be accompanied by discipleship in what is called the spiritual disciplines: prayer, studying the Bible, fellowship/corporate worship, and sharing one’s faith. Such growth is fundamental to the Christian life. But, as with evangelism and church growth, individual disciple-making is insufficient to fulfilling the Great Commission. Jesus sent us to disciple the nations.

The church in South Korea, as is the case elsewhere, has not discipled the nation at the level of culture. The Korean church has been secularized. The church should have discipled the nation with a life-affirming, family-forming, hopeful future. Instead, the nation was discipling the church with its secularistic, narcissistic, consumer-oriented, disaffiliated, child-free culture, one without hope for a personal or national future.

Researchers Sam Hyun Yoo and Victor Agadjanian, in their paper “Did Christian Women Lead Fertility Decline in South Korea?” (download a PDF of the report) demonstrate the correlation between religion and fertility. They point out that global Christianity has often been associated with higher levels of fertility because the church has often resisted artificial birth control. This tradition existed in the church in South Korea for a while. But higher fertility rates in South Korea and neighboring China, coupled with the fear of “overpopulation,” led Korean and Chinese governments to focus on the “ideal” family, one or two children.

I’ve derived the following chart from Yoo and Agadjanian’s article showing the difference in South Korea’s fertility rates 20 years apart according to religious affiliation:

Despite the immense importance Christianity places on family formation, on the celebration of children and the maternal nature of women, Christians dropped below the replacement fertility rate before other groups and appear to be leading the race to the bottom.

We have celebrated the Korean legacy of evangelism, church growth, and the sending of missionaries. Yet, in the long run, what’s to celebrate if the church has forgotten the most basic task of discipling the nation to fulfill the cultural mandate?

In the long run, what’s to celebrate if the church has forgotten the most basic task of discipling the nation to fulfill the cultural mandate?

A POST-CHRISTIAN CLIMATE is leading us to a post-human world. This includes, with the rise of evolutionary ideology, a post-moral world. The rise of radical feminism has led to a post-maternal world. As modernism begins its slow demise, postmodernism has given rise to a post-truth culture and the gender-identity movement.

The post-maternal culture will have a profound effect at the micro level of individual women and a profound effect at the macro level of national and cultural survival. The 1960’s “Population Bomb” myth is giving way among social scientists to a Demographic Winter and The Empty Planet.

We need a narrative that supports the formation of families, the dignity of the maternal and of all human life, and the hope of a future. We get that from the Scriptures, beginning in Genesis 1.

The suicide of South Korea should be a kick in our pants to redouble the effort to expose the cause of this national madness and with a loud voice promote the Biblical mandate to form families and have children. That’s the only means of stopping this self-imposed downward spiral.