Relations Reporting on marriage, family, and sexuality

Once upon a man in a dress

Transgenderism | Libraries across the country invite drag performers to ‘teach’ kids about gender fluidity
by Kiley Crossland
Posted 6/22/18, 04:06 pm

Public libraries across the country are hosting drag performers for children’s story hours in June. What started as a one-off 2015 event in San Francisco has become a national movement of libraries hiring men dressed as women to read books and sing songs with children, all advertised as kid-friendly exposure to gender fluidity.

The events happen year-round, but more libraries are hosting story hours as part of their June LGBT Pride Month events. Libraries and bookstores in Alaska, California, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Vermont are hosting the “Drag Queen Story Hours.”

Organizers say the 45-minute program is designed for children ages 3 to 8. A local drag performer arrives in costume, reads from a selection of two or three books (often with LGBT themes), leads the children in some song and movement activities, and closes with a craft. Hosts herald the “family-friendly” events as an opportunity to draw children into a message of “inclusivity and acceptance” using sequins, extravagant dresses, face paint, and fun.

“What do drag queens and children have in common? They love dressing up and all things sparkly and fancy!” reads an explanation posted on a Brooklyn Public Library event website. “Drag Queen Story Hour captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity in childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.”

But sugarcoating the events does not change the fact that these story hours are led by men dressed in overtly feminine and often sexualized outfits, with stuffed bras, fake eyelashes, and heavy lipstick who otherwise entertain crowds at cabarets and nightclubs.

The drag movement, in contrast to the transgender movement, plays to gender differences—men acting like stereotypical women—while trying to erase the notion that biology has anything to say about it. Drag performers relish the fact that they can personify women and yet live day-to-day as men. Drag performers are sometimes at odds with the transgender advocates, who broadly see gender identity as something one should go to great lengths to permanently embrace.

Despite their differences, both movements deny what Scripture makes clear—God created humans in His image, male and female—and what biology confirms—humans are sexually dimorphic mammals. And both are fighting to normalize their worldview with children.

“Children are so impressionable and easily led,” Jeff Johnston, an issues analyst with Focus on the Family, told me. “Drag queen story times sow confusion and lies into their hearts and minds at a very formative time of life.”

Johnston added that these events push the narrative that “biological differences don’t really matter, that men and women aren’t different, that a person’s ‘gender’ is fluid and changeable, and that someone may have multiple genders.”

In contrast, Johnston encouraged Christian parents to help their children see their gender as God’s good gift: “We want our daughters to grow up to accept and embrace and enjoy their femininity, knowing deep down that being a girl is a good gift from God. Likewise, we want our sons to grow up to be healthy men who embrace their masculinity and see it as a good gift from God.”

Associated Press/Photo by Kamran Jebreili (file) Associated Press/Photo by Kamran Jebreili (file) Caster Semenya

What is a woman athlete?

While too many activist groups are trying to erase all distinctions between genders, the sports world is frantically trying to put some boundaries around them.

Olympic champion runner Caster Semenya of South Africa announced this week she will challenge a new international rule limiting women’s testosterone levels in middle-distance track and field races. Semenya—who experts speculate would be affected by the new rule but has never spoken publicly about her hormone levels—issued a press release calling the new regulation “discriminatory, irrational, unjustifiable” and said she would appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sports.

In April, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), track and field’s governing body, announced it will begin restricting entry to international events from 400 meters through the mile to women with testosterone levels above a specified level. Set to take effect Nov. 1, the new regulation will require athletes with a Difference of Sexual Development (DSD), sometimes called hyperandrogenism, to reduce and maintain their blood testosterone levels to below 5 nanomoles per liter. Average levels for women, including elite female athletes, range from 0.12 to 1.79 nanomoles per liter, according to the IAAF. The organization said it had “broad medical and scientific consensus, supported by peer-reviewed data and evidence” to back its new policy, including research that found 7 in every 1,000 elite female track athletes have elevated testosterone, 140 times what you would find in the general female population.

“The revised rules are not about cheating, no athlete with a DSD has cheated,” the IAAF said in its statement. “They are about leveling the playing field to ensure fair and meaningful competition.”

Semenya, 27, is a two-time Olympic and three-time world champion in the 800 meters. NBC Sports reported that track officials mandated she undergo gender testing in 2009 after she won the 800 meters world championship title by nearly 2.5 seconds. In 2011, the IAAF switched from gender verification testing to natural testosterone level testing. In 2015, the court of arbitration suspended the regulation, ruling it unjustifiably discriminatory. Since 2015, Semenya’s career has taken off.

If her testosterone levels are over the limit, the new regulation would require Semenya to take hormone supplements to reduce her testosterone. If she refused, she could compete in non-international competitions, in short- or long-distance races, in the male classification, or in competitions that offer an intersex classification.

“I just want to run naturally, the way I was born,” Semenya said in a statement Monday. “It is not fair that I am told I must change. It is not fair that people question who I am. I am Mokgadi Caster Semenya. I am a woman, and I am fast.”

Semenya’s appeal requests the court of arbitration suspend the new regulation until it reaches a ruling. —K.C.

Facebook Facebook Ari Nagel poses for a photo with some of the children he has fathered.

Serial sperm donor

In an attempt to rein in an overzealous sperm donor, Israeli officials have reportedly banned the American man from donating in Israel. Ari Nagel, a New York City math professor raised in an Orthodox Jewish home, has reportedly fathered 33 children, with 10 more on the way.

This week, Nagel said he was told the Israeli health ministry had banned the use of his sperm. Under Israeli law, sperm donors must remain anonymous, but Nagel works directly with single women and lesbian couples he meets online, offering his sperm for free. Nagel tries to keep up with the families, attending birthday parties and holiday gatherings, but what he sees as a selfless donation has left 43 children—and counting—meaningfully fatherless. —K.C.

Everyone ‘with a cervix’

A British medical organization has decided to stop using gendered language in ads encouraging cervical screening tests. Cancer Research UK now encourages screenings for everyone “with a cervix.” The group argued the language promotes accuracy: Some women do not have a cervix and some transgender men do. But critics lambasted the organization for its ridiculous verbal gymnastics. “I’m worried about the quality of your research if you don’t know it’s WOMEN who have a cervix,” one woman tweeted. —K.C.

Kiley Crossland

Kiley is a former WORLD correspondent.

Read more from this writer


You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  • Doug Olson
    Posted: Fri, 06/22/2018 04:59 pm

    Good afternoon, Miss Crossland:

    I want you to know that not all professional librarians support the LGBT movement. I am a Christian and a retired professional librarian who worked in a school district, museum, state library and three (3) state prisons during my career. As you are well aware the majority of librarians (75%+) in the United States are women. It is my observation that the vast majority of women librarians are politically very liberal. This is the reason they think/believe that they can offer LGBT programs in the libraries. If the public is willing to withhold funding from the libraries for offering LGBT programs then they will 'scream and rage' (maybe even take the issue to court??) but will be forced to comply!! These professional librarians are only advancing their own political agendas like the media, businesses, some governments, etc.

    Doug Olson

  • Narissara
    Posted: Fri, 06/22/2018 06:16 pm

    To very young children, a man in such an elaborate “costume” is no different than Santa Claus or some other storybook character who comes to visit story time (which some children actually find frightening).  We need to pray that when these children figure out Santa Claus is a myth, they’ll rethink stuff like this at the same time.

  • CC
    Posted: Sat, 06/23/2018 01:08 am

    I retired from teaching high school a year ago. My high school bragged about having a transgender student running for homecoming queen. (He lost.) When he appeared in my history class, he was a cheerleader. He asked me if I supported the LGBT movement. I told him that I didn't oppose it. He reacted by saying loudly, "Well, I guess I won't ask YOU to support my LGBT rights petition. I ignored the statement and continued to help students. He transferred out of my class the next day. He had three girls sitting with him in a group of desks. After the transgender student transferred out, the three girls moved to another group of desks by the door. One girl who had been a problem before, sat with her earphones on listening to music. Ear phones are against the rule in the high school. I asked her to take them off. She pretended not to hear me. I removed head phones and took the phone that was sticking out of her pocket. I didn't touch her, but it was still a mistake. I told her she could pick up the phone in the office. (School rule.) When I later went to the office with the phone, I was called into the counselor's office with my union rep. The student had left my class early and wrote a complaint. She said that I had groped her vagina. I was shocked and frightened. I was immediately removed from duty until police detectives could investigate. They found that the stories of the three girls were not consistent and did not register charges against me. I was removed from the high school and placed in a middle school. I raised five children, one of whom is a daughter. My kids were outraged over the accusations as was my church. My union appointed attorney told me that false sexual accusations against teachers are becoming an epidemic. When this happens, nobody believes your story. People want to believe that kids don't lie, but they do. I was very happy to retire, but I have no respect for the political correctness that is destroying the education of our kids.

  • OldMike
    Posted: Mon, 06/25/2018 04:54 pm

    Must we now add libraries to that list of places we shouldn’t take our kids?  One thing we must remember, and remind our elected officials of, is that WE are owners of those libraries, paying our taxes to support them. 

    And women's athletics are already threatened by men claiming to be, and wanting to compete as, women. I expect it to get worse. 

    How foolish we humans become in our efforts to become so much wiser than our predecessors. 

  •  phillipW's picture
    Posted: Wed, 06/27/2018 02:46 pm

    I am disgusted beyond apathy at all of this.  The responsible adults have lost control and the inmates are running the asylum.  There is no shame at bad behavior anymore in society.  Our public "education" system isn't just broken, it's dangerous.

    I honestly don't know what recourse, if any, we have as citizens.  I'm too poor to fight a system that cowers to any perceived slight against any and all disturbed groups and/or individuals.  I honestly don't know if fighting anything makes a difference.  Just as I see with cake bakers and florists taking cases to the SCOTUS, the "decisions" SCOTUS makes are not really decisions, but more like an assembly of punters.  "We won't decide this issue outright, for fear of offending someone, or something, so we'll simply send this back to the state courts, and let them bicker back and forth endlessly.

    Without justice in this country, the chaos that is ensuing was inevitable.  No morals, no standards, no decency, and no shame.  Is this really the United States that I was raised up in?

    The only people winning in all of this are the lawyers.