Beginnings Reporting on science and intelligent design

Measles outbreak reignites vaccine debate

Science | More than 50 people sickened in a Washington county with lower-than-average vaccination rates
by Kiley Crossland
Posted 2/07/19, 03:05 pm

Health officials in Washington state are trying to contain a measles outbreak that grew this week to more than 50 confirmed cases. Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, declared a state of emergency in late January, as an average of one new case daily was reported since the first patient tied to the outbreak sought medical care on Dec. 31.

The Washington State Department of Health reported 51 confirmed cases of the extraordinarily contagious airborne virus through Wednesday. Clark County in southern Washington near Portland, Ore., is the epicenter of the outbreak with 50 of the cases. Oregon has reported one confirmed case connected to the Washington outbreak. The vast majority of those infected are children under the age of 10.

Early symptoms of the measles include a fever, runny nose, and cough, followed by a blotchy rash that starts around the head and moves down the body. Though most people recover, serious complications include pneumonia and brain infection that can lead to blindness, deafness, brain damage, or death. In the decade before the measles vaccine was first introduced in 1963, between 400 and 500 people in the United States died of the disease every year, and nearly all children got measles by the time they were 15, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The United States declared the disease eradicated in 2000, but periodic outbreaks occurred as travelers infected in countries where measles was still common brought the virus back home. Last year, there were 17 measles outbreaks (defined as three or more cases) and more than 350 virus infections, the CDC reported.

Health officials in Washington state report that most of the measles cases in the current outbreak occurred in people who did not receive the vaccine against the virus. The CDC recommends children get two doses of the measles vaccine as part of routine childhood immunizations. One dose, usually given between 12 and 15 months, is 93 percent effective at preventing the illness. The second dose, usually given between the ages of 4 and 6, provides protection for 97 percent of people.

Exposing an unvaccinated population to the measles virus is like “taking a lighted match and throwing it in a bucket of gasoline,” said Alan Melnick, public health director for Clark County. “If you have a large unvaccinated population and you add measles to the mix, one measles case will infect 90 percent of contacts, and the early symptoms are not distinguishable from other respiratory illnesses—and you’re contagious at that point.” The virus can remain actively airborne in a contained space for up to two hours after its introduction.

Washington is one of 17 states that allows parents to send their children to school without vaccinations if they express a philosophical or personal objection to immunizations. The median rate of kindergartners in public and private schools who received the vaccine againt measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) in the United States was 94.3 percent for the 2017-2018 school year, according to the CDC. In Washington state, the rate was 90 percent, and in Clark County, 84.3 percent of kindergartners had the MMR vaccine, according to the Washington State Department of Health. About 8 percent of Washington kindergartners’ parents requested exemptions to the vaccine requirements, with 6.3 percent for personal or philosophical reasons.

Most other states allow parents to exempt their children from immunizations for medical or religious reasons. Just three states—California, Mississippi, and West Virginia—allow exemptions only for medical reasons.

Parents who have concerns about vaccinations often cite the possible side effects they can cause. Others have concerns about the origins of the rubella vaccine, which, along with five other common vaccines, was manufactured using human tissue cultures originally derived from an aborted baby. WORLD editor in chief Marvin Olasky examined those concerns in detail in his 2015 report “Applying a Christian worldview to the vaccination issue.”

Michelle Cretella, a pediatrician and the executive director of the American College of Pediatricians (ACP), a morally conservative alternative to the American Academy of Pediatrics, told me her organization stands behind vaccines in terms of effectiveness and safety, following the CDC guidelines and recommendations. (The only area where they differ is not supporting school mandates of the human papillomavirus, or HPV, vaccine. HPV is a sexually transmitted disease.) “Vaccines are a victim of their own success,” she said. “The general population doesn’t really see measles anymore. You forget that children used to die from measles.”

But Cretella acknowledged the tension between vaccine mandates and parental autonomy, stating that the ACP “recognizes parents as the primary educators and nurturers of their children” and advises pediatricians to work with parents who are vaccine-hesitant.

Washington state Rep. Paul Harris, a Republican, introduced a bipartisan measure on Jan. 25 that would remove the philosophical exemption for the MMR vaccine. Previous attempts to revoke the personal exemption provisions in Washington and Oregon have failed. A hearing is scheduled for Friday.

“People are feeling extremely oppressed and feeling like they can’t make an educated decision,” said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of Informed Choice Washington, a group that opposes the bill. She said the measure proposed by Harris would “bring a hammer down and threaten people instead of allowing them to make informed decisions.”

In 2015, California revoked its personal belief exemption for children in both public and private schools after a measles outbreak at Disneyland infected 147 people. The state gives parents who don’t want to vaccinate their children the option of enrolling them in an independent study program at a local public school.

iStock.com/HighGradeRoots iStock.com/HighGradeRoots

Marijuana use and moms

One-third of pregnant women do not believe cannabis poses a risk to their babies, according to a study published this month in the journal Preventive Medicine. Researchers reviewed six studies conducted in the United States and found marijuana use by pregnant women is increasing as more states legalize the drug for recreational use.

In one study, doctors tested hair and urine samples of pregnant women and found 28 percent tested positive for cannabis use. The studies also indicated that most pregnant cannabis users are under the age of 25, unemployed, single, and used other substances such as tobacco and alcohol. Many also suffered from anxiety or depression. Most of the women who used marijuana did so during the first trimester to treat nausea.

Many professional organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that pregnant and nursing women avoid marijuana use. Studies show cannabis use during pregnancy causes increased risks of anemia, low birth weight, stillbirth, and newborn admission to neonatal intensive care units. But some of the women reported they did not receive any counseling from their health professionals regarding the risks of cannabis, a fact they interpreted to mean the drug is safe.

“With this in mind, it’s especially important for health care providers to ask specific questions about cannabis use during pregnancy and breastfeeding to help spark a productive conversation about the potential health impacts and to help support women in their decision to reduce use and quit,” Hamideh Bayrampour, the lead researcher, said in a statement. —Julie Borg

iStock.com/Wildnerdpix iStock.com/Wildnerdpix An island in the High Arctic near Cape Dyer, Canada

Superbugs in the Arctic

Health experts warn the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria could threaten to set world health back to the days before Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin in 1928. And these microbes appear to be spreading far and wide.

Researchers were recently shocked to find genes linked to so-called superbugs in a pristine and remote region of the High Arctic that has experienced little human impact. The scientists did not find living superbugs in the 40 soil samples they gathered, but they did discover 131 genes the microbes left behind. DNA analysis showed that the genes came from organisms that are resistant to nine major antibiotic classes that doctors use to treat a wide variety of infections.

Researchers first detected the antibiotic-resistant genes 8,000 miles away in surface waters in India in 2010. They likely spread to Arctic soil by the fecal matter of birds, other wildlife, and human visitors to the area.

David Graham, the lead researcher, noted that the results of the study confirm that antibiotic resistance represents a global problem, not just a local one: “Encroachment into areas like the Arctic reinforces how rapid and far-reaching the spread of antibiotic resistance has become.” —J.B.

Biotech company claims cancer cure

A small Israeli biotech company recently announced it may have developed the first complete cure for cancer, The Jerusalem Post reported.

Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies (AEBi) said its drug cocktail, MuTaTo, short for multi-target toxin, offers several advantages over current cancer treatments. With traditional drug therapies, cancer cells often adapt and become resistant to the drug, but cancer cell mutations do not appear to hinder MuTaTo’s efficacy. It carries a strong toxin that can kill cancer cells before they have time to produce detoxifying chemicals, and it targets both fast-growing malignant cells as well as slower-growing cancer stem cells that can cause the disease to come back after treatment stops. MuTaTo also acts like an octopus and can sneak into small places on cells that the larger molecules of traditional therapy cannot reach.

Ian Morad, CEO of AEBi, said MuTaTo may also reduce the side effects of most cancer treatments because it zeroes in on more specific targets. Treatment can be individualized for each person and would likely only require a few weeks. AEBi plans to begin a round of human clinical trials that could be completed within a few years. —J.B.

Remains unearthed in ancient Christian community

Archaeologists in Slovenia are working to identify the remains of a mystery woman unearthed in a 1,700-year-old cemetery. The researchers discovered the remains in 2017 in a chapel in the ancient Christian community of Emona under the modern city of Ljubljana, Slovenia. About 350 other burial sites encircled hers, suggesting she was a person of high influence and likely the first interred at the site, National Geographic reported.

It appears her burial occurred about the same time Christian communities began the practice of “ad sanctos,” burying the deceased near the tombs of saints and with other remains they considered holy. The woman was buried with two bracelets and a blue glass drinking bowl decorated with grapes and vines on the outside, bearing a Greek inscription that reads, “Drink to live forever, for many years!” The grapevine decorations could be associated with the Christian practice of Holy Communion or with Dionysus, the pagan god of wine and ecstasy. The archaeologists hope analysis of the woman’s remains will shed light on her identity and why she was so highly honored. —J.B.

Kiley Crossland

Kiley reports on marriage, family, and sexuality for WORLD Digital. Follow Kiley on Twitter @KileyCrossland.

Read more from this writer

Comments

You must be a WORLD Member and be logged in to the website to comment.
  • Tommy and Joyce
    Posted: Fri, 03/08/2019 04:13 pm

    I read Olasky's vaccine article.  He was wrong on a few points.  The original 2 aborted baby cell lines are becoming tumerogenic requiring replacements.  The most recent replacement is WALVAX2.  They aborted 9 babies by the waterbag method (delivered while still alive) and dissected them while they were still alive.  

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21645515.2015.1009811?fbclid...

    All that to say, would it be possible for WORLD to do an investigative journal article to answer these questions?

    1. How many people got diseases for which there are vaccines? (Last five years)

    2. How many of those had been vaccinated?

    3. How many people suffered serious harm from these diseases?

    4. How many people filed claims with the national agency that processes claims for being injured by vaccines? (last five years)

    5. I have heard that each of the vaccines have been tested as being safe, but that no tests have been done to test whether giving multiple vaccines in the normal protocols are safe. Is this true?  Also, do the safety tests really count if the vaccines were not tested in a double-blind placebo study? 

    6. How many safety studies were done by the drug companies? Has the original data been reviewed independently.

    Finally, I don't know if you are aware or not, but Facebook, Google, Amazon, Instagram and several other sites are censoring anything perceived to be anti-vax content per the request of Senator Schiff.  You can find his letter to Mr. Zuckerberg and Senator Posey's counter letter here:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Rep-Posey-LetterTo...
     

  • JG
    Posted: Wed, 03/27/2019 03:15 am

    I agree with everything you said, Tommy and Joyce. I would like to see some analysis of the issues outlined here by WORLD. It’s pretty hard to take their reporting and editorializing on this issue seriously without some critical thinking about these questions.

ADVERTISEMENT