The Sift Here’s what we’re Sifting today

Kavanaugh claims ‘no agenda’ during marathon session

by Harvest Prude
Posted 9/06/18, 09:08 am

WASHINGTON—Senators grilled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh for nearly 12 hours on Day Two of his confirmation hearing Wednesday. All 21 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned President Donald Trump’s pick to replace Anthony Kennedy on the high court, with many touching on hot-button topics like abortion, gun control, executive authority, and affirmative action.

Kavanaugh resisted commenting on hypothetical situations, past remarks by Trump, or on current controversies, saying nominees should stay “three ZIP codes away from the line of current events or politics.” Instead, he continually emphasized the importance of respecting Supreme Court precedent, justices remaining independent, and loyalty to the Constitution. “I have no agenda in any direction,” Kavanaugh said.

Republican committee members attempted several times to head off anticipated questions from Democrats, soliciting Kavanaugh’s views on executive power and respecting precedent on cases like Roe v. Wade, but his answers did not stop Democrats from circling back multiple times to the issues of abortion and presidential authority throughout the day and night.

Protesters for the second day interrupted the proceedings repeatedly, shouting, “Sham president, sham justice!” and “Vote no!” as U.S. Capitol Police ushered them quickly out of the room. The efficient and expedient work of the police drew bipartisan praise later in the day.

Senators begin a second round of questioning Kavanaugh on Thursday, with each committee member allocated 20 minutes.

Read more from The Sift Sign up for The Sift email
Harvest Prude

Harvest is a political reporter for WORLD's Washington Bureau. She is a World Journalism Institute and Patrick Henry College graduate. Harvest resides in Washington, D.C. Follow her on Twitter @HarvestPrude.

Read more from this writer


You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  • OldMike
    Posted: Thu, 09/06/2018 02:07 pm

    The element of theater in the hearings is interesting. 

    The Dems surely realize confirmation is all but inevitable.  Or do they expect/hope some heretofore unknown past radical utterance by Kavanaugh will at last come to light to scuttle the nomination?

    So basically aren’t they posturing to impress their leftist base?

    Also, I’m certain there are quite stringent security screenings for admission to these hearings. Are we to believe protestors with large signs were able to smuggle signs in undetected?  Or are those signs actually allowed in just so the police can be seen to escort the protestors out for creating a disruption—only after the media gets good footage of the protests, of course?  

    And final question: is it not part of our times that nothing we see in the MSM can be taken at face value?

    Posted: Thu, 09/06/2018 08:32 pm

    I agree with Old Mike.