Confusing case
Prosecutors have dropped all charges against actor Jussie Smollett for allegedly staging an attack on himself, but Chicago-area authorities insist that doesn’t mean he is innocent. Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx gave no explanation for why her office wasn’t pursuing the case against Smollett, who is accused of hiring two brothers to fake a racist, anti-gay attack on him on the streets of Chicago in late January. Police said last month that Smollett planned the hoax because he was unhappy with his salary on Empire, a television show on Fox about an African-American family in the music industry, and wanted to promote his career.
Foxx said in an interview Wednesday with WBBM-TV in Chicago that the decision to drop the charges was “an outcome that we could expect with this type of case.” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel disagreed, calling it a “whitewash of justice,” and Joseph Magats, the assistant state’s attorney who handled the case, said he does not think Smollett is innocent, either. Smollett had to forfeit $10,000 in bond money, and Chicago officials on Thursday ordered him to pay $130,000 to cover the cost of the police investigation into his claims.
Eight days before the fake attack, the actor received a threatening letter at the Chicago studio where Empire is shot. Chicago police previously said he sent it to himself. The FBI is still investigating the letter and hasn’t commented on the state of its inquiry. President Donald Trump weighed in Thursday, tweeting that the FBI and the Department of Justice would review the “outrageous” case, calling it an embarrassment to the country.
The case stoked political and racial tension across the United States. Trump critics initially sympathized with Smollett, who said his attackers wore the “Make America Great Again” caps popularized during Trump’s presidential campaign. (The alleged attackers did wear such hats—they said Smollett wrote them a check to go buy them.) When police said the whole thing was a hoax, Trump supporters hit back, accusing liberals of groupthink and hysteria.
Smollett still stands by his claims and says the two brothers who accused him of setting up the attack are lying. —Lynde Langdon
Comments
VISTA48
Posted: Sun, 03/31/2019 01:02 pmSo a 16 year old can get an abortion without parental consent, but a movie about abortion is "too dangerous for people younger than 17". Do these people ever actually listen to themselves?
VolunteerBB
Posted: Mon, 04/01/2019 07:58 pmKLOVE's answer is part of the problem. "We want to be loving and encouraging" Well, that is good, but abortion is ugly and it needs to be exposed for what it is and talked about. So they can't even promote this prolife movie and let people decide if they should go see it or not? Cowards!
DS
Posted: Wed, 04/03/2019 08:24 amWhat does Focus on the Family's Plugged In say?
Katie
Posted: Wed, 04/03/2019 10:50 amHere's a link to their review: https://www.pluggedin.com/movie-reviews/unplanned-2019
And here's a link to World's review: https://world.wng.org/2019/03/stepping_away_from_evil
I'm encouraging everyone I know to consider going to see this movie.
DS
Posted: Wed, 04/03/2019 01:40 pmK-Love has shown signs of going somewhat left (politically) before. For instance, I do some of the music surveys, and there for a while, they would have one song each from eighteen artists, but two songs for Lauren Daigle. She has become obviously less and less Christian with each song she releases to the radio. I find this (and their silence with Unplanned) disturbing.