The Sift Here’s what we’re Sifting today

Justices decline guns, police, immigration cases

by Kyle Ziemnick
Posted 6/15/20, 04:48 pm

WASHINGTON—It’s officially summer in the District of Columbia when the nation’s highest court goes on its end-of-session decision spree. On Monday, justices turned down challenges to rules that shield police officers from monetary lawsuits. The doctrine of qualified immunity came under fire in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police in late May. Justices Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor have said in the past they wanted to review the doctrine, and Thomas wrote a six-page dissent against the decision not to hear any of the eight separate cases.

What else happened at the court today? In addition to ruling on LGBT workers’ rights, the justices let stand lower court rulings that allow California cities to provide sanctuary for potentially illegal immigrants. President Donald Trump’s administration had sued the state, arguing the law made the deportation of illegal immigrants more difficult. The court also declined to hear challenges to gun control laws in four states. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Thomas dissented, wanting to hear a New Jersey case about openly carrying a gun for self-defense.

Dig deeper: Read Harvest Prude’s report in The Stew about the debate on Capitol Hill over how to best reform policing in the United States.

Read more from The Sift Sign up for The Sift email
Kyle Ziemnick

Kyle is a graduate of the World Journalism Institute.

Read more from this writer


You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
    Posted: Tue, 06/16/2020 05:02 pm

    Officers should not be sued.

    The court should not bankrupt a family because an officer most likely made a mistake. That would hamstring officers from doing their job. Because they worry every minute that someone will sue them for something they said or did. Nobody is perfect. We all make mistakes. 

    Posted: Tue, 06/16/2020 05:31 pm

    If a state or city decides to become a sanctuary city and harbor illegal immigrants then they should pay for it. Our tax dollars should not go to paying those places or people for breaking the law. Either we have a law or we don't. You can't have a law and decide you won't obey it. That is anarchy.