Compassion Reporting on poverty fighting and criminal justice

Hiking the minimum wage has unintended consequences

Compassion | The pandemic builds momentum for lifting the wage floor
by Charissa Koh
Posted 1/27/21, 02:28 pm

The idea of raising the minimum wage is gaining steam in the United States. Twenty states increased their minimum wage at the start of this year—at least by $0.08 and at most by $1.50. President Joe Biden’s proposed COVID-19 legislation increases the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour. But some economists warn that the move will backfire, leaving fewer jobs and smothering the small businesses that have survived the pandemic thus far.

The federal government last increased the minimum wage in 2009, to $7.25 per hour. Many states set their own wage floor, while several use the federal number. Over the last decade, cities including Seattle and San Francisco enacted plans to gradually increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour. New York and California were the first to adopt similar plans statewide. Last fall, Florida adopted the $15 minimum wage through a ballot measure, and in January seven states raised their minimum wage as part of phased plans. Other states tied minimum wage to the cost of living or inflation. In 2019, the House of Representatives passed a bill to raise the nationwide wage, but it stalled in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Proponents of the increase argue it would give workers a livable income as many American cities become unaffordable. They point out the federal number would be $12 an hour if it had kept up with inflation. And the pandemic showed how vulnerable many Americans were as low-wage workers disproportionately lost jobs.

But opponents argue that a healthy economy has jobs available at various income levels. If businesses must pay workers a higher amount, they will reduce the number of employees and keep the more skilled. This means fewer jobs for the least skilled low-income workers. A 2019 Congressional Budget Office survey estimated increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025 would mean 1.3 million fewer jobs in the United States.

Meanwhile, the pandemic didn’t just hurt workers: Small businesses are struggling to survive. Tina Miller and her husband started Walkabout Outfitter, an outdoor equipment store in rural Virginia. Starting pay is $10 an hour, and most employees are students who work part time. The pandemic reduced their business significantly—at one point, it was down 90 percent. The Millers took out loans, laid off most of their staff, and used their savings to cover their expenses. The state is set to increase the minimum wage to $12 an hour in 2023, then $15 an hour in 2026. “We’ve run the numbers, and you know, it would potentially put us out of business,” Miller told NPR.

“The timing [of Biden’s plan] is terrible and the tradeoffs are not worth it,” Competitive Enterprise Institute economist Ryan Young said. “Small businesses often have a hard time making payroll as it is, with bills and rent still piling up amid COVID-related slowdowns. A higher minimum wage would do no good for the workers who would be let go because of it.”

Read more Compassion Sign up for the Compassion email
Charissa Koh

Charissa is a WORLD reporter who often writes about poverty fighting and prison reform, including profiling ministries in the annual Hope Awards for Effective Compassion competition. She is also a part of WORLD's investigative unit, the Caleb Team. Charissa resides with her husband, Josh, in Austin, Texas. Follow her on Twitter @CharissaKoh.

Read more from this writer


You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  • OldMike
    Posted: Wed, 01/27/2021 06:16 pm

    No one can, or should have to try to, survive on $7.25 minimum wage.  Or even $10 an hour. 

    But adults living on their own should not remain at such a low skill level they only rate minimum wage.  Housewives or retirees who only want to work a shift or two a week, maybe can accept minimum wage. Teens still living at home can afford to work minimum wage, and at the beginning they don't have a lot of skill or experience. But they should be quickly learning things that make them more useful and valuable to employers. 

    And that is the goal workers should be setting--learning and growing so you are a more valuable employee every year. People that take an attitude of, "I don't care and I'm not doing more than the least effort possible," well, it's on them isn't it, if they stay at the bottom of the wage ladder. Why should an employer be forced to pay more for minimal performance?

    On the other hand, what if someone is growing and learning, but the employer refuses to reward that?  Leave. Go where you're appreciated. Vote with your feet.  An employer who does not reward diligence and effort and skills does not deserve good employees. He deserves the bottom-of-the-barrel, no effort, don't-care worker, since that is all he is willing to pay for.  

    All of this is simple economics--you are responsible for setting your own value, and if you increase your value you have a right to expect to be rewarded. The converse is true too. But government wage setting interferes with that simple system of reward for performance. It's not sound economics. 

  • DG
    Posted: Thu, 01/28/2021 11:27 am

    I agree as well.  The only time I earned minimum wage was at my very first job as a teenager.  Now I have 3 teenagers in the part-time work force (at different jobs) while they are also in school.  Our state minimum wage is just above the federal amount, but all of my teenagers currently earn hourly wages several dollars above the minimum wage.  Even as part-time employees they have proven themselves to be valuable hard workers and received raises accordingly.

    Setting a much higher minimum wage not only artificially creates a higher cost to hire brand new, unproven workers, it forces employers to either increase wages for most if not all existing hourly employees, or start to reduce labor costs or raise prices for goods (or both).  Reducing labor costs usually means laying off or not bringing back employees while increasing automation or decreasing services.  The real world impact of this decision is not hidden or unintended consequences, just straightforward economics. 

  • Bygracealone
    Posted: Thu, 01/28/2021 10:49 am

    Old Mike, AGREE!  goodness gracious, products and services have to move in&out in order to produce the business income to pay workers.  I'm not an economist, but a consumer with experience... good grief, what stupidity to artificially raise a minimum wage.... it begs government control of the economy, and good business practices that mostly built this country suffer!

    Posted: Fri, 01/29/2021 12:32 pm

    Most min wage jobs are for first time job entrants. We seem to have aborted a great deal of those or they flat out werent conceived because so many folks failed in the "be fruitful and multiply" dept. 

    No one should be permitted to work minimum wage once theyve hit age 25. That's an arbitrary age but 8 years is plent of time to focus on and prepare for a better paying job. Adult min wage earners whom I've known were often parolees. They are doing good to have a burger flipping job; most hiring managers are loathe to hire anyone with a prison stint tucked in the resume. 

    The age cap would actually be beneficial: "George you're a hard worker and do a consistently great job here. And you hit 25 next month. So because of your productivity and the visible benefit we get having you on our team we're upping your pay AND giving you advanced responsibility(ies)."