Vitals Reporting on the pro-life movement

Cheering on suicide

Euthanasia | How Canada treats euthanasia patients who donate their organs
by Mary Jackson
Posted 1/13/20, 03:53 pm

Organ donation companies in Canada are targeting patients who want to end their lives by physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. The Ottawa Citizen last week lauded the country’s “medical aid in dying” law as a boon for organ and tissue shortages. The newspaper reported that in the first 11 months of last year, “medically assisted” deaths in Ontario accounted for 113 organ and tissue donations, a 14 percent increase since 2018, and a 109 percent jump from 2017.

Canada decriminalized doctor-prescribed or -administered suicide in 2016. Since then, Ontario has contracted with Trillium Gift of Life Network, an organ- and tissue-procurement company, to actively solicit patients approved for assisted suicide. Ontario’s waiting list of people who need donated organs hovered at 1,600 people until this “relatively new source” for body parts surfaced, the newspaper reported.

Ontario is the first jurisdiction in the world that requires hospitals to notify Trillium of known imminent deaths, including by euthanasia. The company insists that patients’ choices to donate organs do not influence their decisions to end their lives. But Ronnie Gavsie, Trillium’s chief executive officer, praised patients who choose “death with dignity” and organ donation, saying they are “leaving a legacy.”

Euthanized patients made up 5 percent of all of Ontario’s organ and tissue donations last year, up from 3.6 percent in 2018 and 2.1 percent in 2017.

“The clear message being sent to suicidal ill and disabled Canadians—with the active support of the organ transplant community—is that their deaths can have greater value to Canada than their lives,” Wesley Smith, a senior fellow at Discovery Institute’s Center for Human Exceptionalism, wrote for the National Review.

Many ill and disabled patients in Canada who are donating their organs are not “imminently dying,” he noted, and they do not receive any suicide prevention services.

Some form of euthanasia is legal in Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and nine U.S. states plus the District of Columbia. Switzerland and the U.S. states that have approved physician-assisted suicide, in which a patient self-administers a deadly drug prescribed by a doctor, do not allow those patients to donate their organs.

“There is growing evidence that coercion plays a substantial role for many vulnerable people” considering assisted suicide, said John Smeaton, chief executive of the U.K.-based Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. “Conflating this decision with organ donation further complicates the issue of coercion.”

Some doctors are taking it a step further, pushing to harvest vital organs while patients are still alive, or death by donation. E. Wesley Ely, a pulmonary and critical care physician, wrote in a recent column for USA Today that the idea of carrying out euthanasia by placing donors under general anesthesia and surgically removing their vital organs while they are still living is gaining traction.

Similarly, two Canadian doctors and a Harvard Medical School ethicist recently wrote in The New England Journal of Medicine that procuring consenting patients’ organs while they are still alive “may be ethically preferable.”

“Everybody says, ‘Well, it can’t get any lower than it is,’” Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Canada-based Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, told LifeSite News. “But we’ll get lower than it is, because every time you break a new ethical barrier, it opens up a new question.”

Facebook/Carla Condell Lockhart Facebook/Carla Condell Lockhart Carla Lockhart

Passionate plea

A newly elected member of the British Parliament from Northern Ireland urged lawmakers to repeal a law that stripped the nation of its long-standing protections for unborn babies.

In her first speech to the House of Commons last week, Carla Lockhart, a member of the Democratic Unionist Party and a new mother, lambasted the measure, which took effect three months ago.

“It is imperative that I speak … to highlight the anger, disappointment, and frustration concerning the change in abortion laws that have been foisted upon the people of Northern Ireland,” she said.

The Parliament of the United Kingdom legalized abortion in the traditionally conservative region by taking advantage of Northern Ireland’s politically deadlocked government and imposing a sweeping amendment in October, leaving people shell-shocked and grieving.

“These changes came in the most roughshod way, with complete contempt for the devolved administration and the views of the people of Northern Ireland,” Lockhart told Parliament. “Abortion was and should be a [local] matter, yet this House has imposed on Northern Ireland the most extreme measures of abortion anywhere across Europe.”

Until now, a 158-year-old law, rooted in Northern Ireland’s Christian heritage, protected babies from abortion unless the mother’s life was at risk. If the law stands, the nation will begin incorporating abortion into its public health services on March 31. —M.J.

March for Life UK March for Life UK Pro-life advocates outside a closed abortion facility in Birmingham, England

Answered prayer

Pro-life groups credited decades of prayer as the oldest abortion facility in the United Kingdom recently shut its doors after performing abortions for half a century.

The Calthorpe Clinic in Edgbaston, a suburb of Birmingham, England, closed on Dec. 31 after a grievous history of killing tens of thousands of unborn babies, injuring women, and numerous health and safety violations. The facility, which opened in 1969, was the first in Britain to perform abortions exclusively.

“We have faithfully waited many years to hear this news,” said Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, director of 40 Days for Life in Birmingham. “We are so grateful to God for letting us see the fruit of our prayers.” —M.J.


Read more Vitals Sign up for the Vitals email
Mary Jackson

Mary is a book reviewer and reporter for WORLD. She is a World Journalism Institute and Geenville University graduate who previously worked for the Lansing (Mich.) State Journal. Mary resides with her family in the San Francisco Bay area. Follow her on Twitter @mbjackson77.

Read more from this writer

Comments

You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  • Narissara
    Posted: Mon, 01/13/2020 06:25 pm

    Re harvesting organs from patients still alive -- the first thought that came to mind was the ancient and barbaric practice of disemboweling criminals and prisoners of war.  But this benefits civilized society??  Disgusting.  

  • Rich277
    Posted: Tue, 01/14/2020 07:29 am

    It's a worldview that sees the common masses as replaceable cogs in the machine of state.  The elites who pretend to care for us live by a different standard, of course.

  • RC
    Posted: Tue, 01/14/2020 10:58 am

    “Similarly, two Canadian doctors and a Harvard Medical School ethicist recently wrote in The New England Journal of Medicine that procuring consenting patients’ organs while they are still alive “may be ethically preferable.””

    Riping organs out while they are still alive. What kinds of ethics are they talking about?  It sure looks like these doctors graduated from the Josef Mengele School of Medicine.

ADVERTISEMENT