The Sift Here’s what we’re Sifting today

Biden flip-flops on abortion funding

by Harvest Prude
Posted 6/07/19, 01:02 pm

After intense criticism from pro-abortion advocates, former Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday he no longer supports the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal dollars from directly funding abortion except in cases of rape, incest, and when the mother’s life is endangered.

Biden announced at a Democratic National Committee event in Atlanta on Thursday that he changed his position due to Republican lawmakers in some states passing “extreme laws in clear violation of constitutional rights.”

“I can’t justify leaving millions of women without access to the care they need and the ability to exercise their constitutionally protected right,” Biden said. “If I believe health care is a right, as I do, I can no longer support an amendment that makes that right dependent on someone’s ZIP code.”

In an exchange captured on video, Biden last month seemed to tell an American Civil Liberties Union volunteer that he would support repealing the Hyde Amendment. His campaign later clarified that Biden had “not at this point changed his position on the Hyde Amendment” but “misheard the woman” and “thought she was referring to the Mexico City rule, which prevents federal aid money from going to organizations overseas that perform abortions.”

Several of Biden’s rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination quickly reiterated their support for repealing the amendment, including Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, and Kamala Harris of California, some of whom voted for the amendment when it was included in various appropriations bills to fund the government, Politico reported.

Pro-life advocates criticized Biden for caving to the abortion lobby.

“Joe Biden’s support for taxpayer funding of abortion after decades of opposition is just the latest example of Democratic extremism on abortion,” Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement.

Not a single Democratic contender for 2020 has taken a pro-life position. Many of them have pledged to uphold even more extreme pro-abortion policies such as codifying Roe v. Wade into national law so the Supreme Court cannot reverse it.

Read more from The Sift Sign up for The Sift email
Harvest Prude

Harvest is a reporter for WORLD based in Washington, D.C.

Read more from this writer


You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  • OldMike
    Posted: Fri, 06/07/2019 02:44 pm

    Glad to see Biden switch his position. Makes him a less palatable choice for those “moderate Christians” looking for a way to justify voting for a Democrat. 

    I am acquainted with a few of those. Some insist that abortion access is important because of the numerous pregnancies caused by rape and incest—“numerous” is a gross mischaracterization. Or they claim they “personally oppose abortion,” but can’t make that decision for someone else. (Doesn’t a civilized society make decisions all the time about individual’s “rights” to commit crimes?)  Or these moderates insist if abortion clinics are shut down, there won’t be any place to get “women's healthcare.”  

    I’m sorry if you disagree, but there is really very little gray area with abortion. It’s quite black and white—abortion is the murder of a human. Only when necessary to save the life of the mother should abortion be permitted. 

    Posted: Fri, 06/07/2019 06:16 pm

    Monies donated to any group are "fungible". I believe that means if our govt donates money for a guerilla group to purchase "Non lethal humanitarian aid" we free them up to use money otherwise not available to purchase ammunition or bayonets. The DC politicians who gave tax moneys to PPFA surely know the donated tax money would free up other funding sources to be used to pay for pro bono abortions.

    Do we know how many free pro bono abortions PPFA pays for?

    How many minors have abortions paid for by adults? And is that not suggestive of sex trafficking or statutory rape?


  • Laura W
    Posted: Sat, 06/08/2019 01:50 am

    Agree about the fungibility part, but I imagine in a "normal" scenario where a pregnant minor is seeking an abortion, there's a good chance that it would be paid for by one or both of her parents. Who would be adults.