The Sift Here’s what we’re Sifting today

Barr: No result-changing election fraud found

by Kyle Ziemnick
Posted 12/01/20, 04:32 pm

WASHINGTON—Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday that lawyers and FBI agents have investigated cases of voter fraud around the country and dug into Americans’ complaints. But they have not found any instances of fraud significant enough to change the outcome of November’s presidential election, he said. He added that the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence to corroborate claims of rigged voting machines.

Are lawsuits still pending in court? President Donald Trump filed a new suit Tuesday in Wisconsin asking the state’s Supreme Court to exclude more than 200,000 absentee ballots in Milwaukee and Dane counties, alleging voters illegally cast them. The case makes arguments that courts have rejected in other states regarding online applications, missing addresses, and illegal ballot drop sites.

Dig deeper: Read Emily Belz’s report on complaints of rigged voting machines.


Read more from The Sift Sign up for The Sift email
Kyle Ziemnick

Kyle is a WORLD Digital news reporter. He is a World Journalism Institute and Patrick Henry College graduate. Kyle resides in Purcellville, Va. Follow him on Twitter @kylezim25.

Read more from this writer

Comments

You must be a WORLD Member and logged in to the website to comment.
  • Hawkdriver
    Posted: Tue, 12/01/2020 09:43 pm

    I live in Wisconsin.  The election laws are good here and in all but 2 counties or so, the laws do get enforced.  Judging by the evidence I've heard, I think the Trump campaign has a very good chance of winning and correcting the vote in Wisconsin.  Unless more happens in other states, it won't change much other to stop a few media folks from saying that "there is no voter fraud."  Breaking election laws is voter fraud.

  • NEWS2ME
    Posted: Wed, 12/02/2020 04:11 pm

    Doesn't ANYONE find it interesting that the gov't body that is investigating voter fraud has been against Trump even BEFORE he became Pres.? The whole Russian thing was theirs. They did not want Trump to be Pres. Why would they find ANY voter fraud evidence AGAINST Biden? What a laugh! 

    So many fbi were brought before the gov't for their corruption, and nothing has come of it. Did they receive a bonus and retire like the irs folks did under Obama?

    Did anyone look at all the people Obama pardoned who sold cocaine? And the press points to Trump for pardoning two old men who were duped by the fbi for something that they wasted our taxpayer money on. There are still eejits out there who still believe Trump colluded with the Russians. So sad.

  • OldMike
    Posted: Wed, 12/02/2020 08:49 pm

    Every time someone new pops up in front of cameras with some new tale about how "they saw truckloads of ballots being delivered in the dark of the night," my first thought is, could we just start off by hooking each new accuser up to a polygraph for a couple of hours? 

  • TIM MILLER
    Posted: Thu, 12/03/2020 08:48 am

    I think some of them might not be lying, per se. They may think they are telling the truth. Several of the affidavits in Michigan were from people who hadn't gone through the poll challenger training and did not know what to look for. There actually were legitimate loads of ballots coming in through the night, because of the way the verification process worked. If that process is not fraud-resistant (I don't know if it's possible to fraud-proof an election), it needs to be changed. But I think a lot of the Michigan affidavits rely heavily on confirmation bias (people already "knew" Detroit was going to cheat) and ignorance of the process. 

  • Cyborg3's picture
    Cyborg3
    Posted: Fri, 12/04/2020 08:18 am

    Do you think this (listen to the two videos) is evidence of voter fraud? It amazes me that so many are duped and claim their was no voter fraud. 
     

    Jesse Morgan, who also works as a USPS subcontractor truck driver, claimed to have driven nearly 300,000 completed mail-in ballots across state lines. 
     

    "I can tell you, I took 24 pallets," Morgan told Hannity."This happened on Oct. 21, and I picked them up in Bethpage, N.Y. and drove them to Harrisburg [Pa.] and from Harrisburg, I drove them to Lancaster, dropped the trailer in Lancaster, dropped my truck off, and went home."

    Here is Jesse Morgan's testimony on YouTube. 

    Another postal worker (a young 20 year old guy) told how he was supposed to deliver 100,000 missing ballots to Wisconsin.
     
    Pease said he was told that "100,000 ballots were supposedly missing in the state of Wisconsin and an order came down to look for them from the Wisconsin-Illinois USPS chapter."

    It is interesting how he looked on Election Day and found no ballots but after the election the ballots magically appear for the guy to deliver. 

    Another election poll watcher describes watching military ballots come in where they all supposedly voted for Biden. 
     

    Bar is a good man but he is dependent on the lower level officials who have a record of being anti-Trump. If they shield him from the real evidence of corruption, then yes he won't find any evidence of voter fraud.  All the liberal media are in bed with Biden so they are pretending that there is no evidence of election fraud, when there is clear evidence in front of them. It is very likely that this election will be overturned if more evidence keeps surfacing. The Democrats strategy is to pretend like the vast voter fraud doesn't exist and ignore it. If they can just walk Biden into the White House then they win. The challenge for the Republicans is to obtain all the evidence, communicate it in a lucid fashion for the public to see and to present it convincingly in court to get the elections overturned. We will see what happens! 

  • TIM MILLER
    Posted: Fri, 12/04/2020 12:34 pm

    "Big, if true." -Sean Hannity

    Youtube videos are not compelling evidence unless there's other testimony or information backing them up. The Trump campaign isn't even bringing these allegations to court, so they must not trust them. There's a reason lawyers try their case on TV instead of in court -- usually that's when their case is too weak to win in court.

    World did a report a few months back on Ravi Zacharias and the accusations against him. They did due diligence, checking with multiple sources, corraborating information, and painstakingly making sure they had the facts from all sides. They got piled on, still, because people did not want to believe bad things about their hero (I didn't want to, either.). But they did not go with just one piece of hearsay evidence; they waited a few weeks before the first allegations came out to report, because they did not have corraborating evidence.

    Now, I'm being told that I should believe hundreds of dubious claims, made without corraboration by a legal team with a record of sloppiness and outright dishonesty, simply because ... if they win, I get the outcome I wanted?

    That's not the way it should work. Where there is fraud, I want it discovered. But I do not want to be part of a rush to falsely accuse election workers of fraud. That's just as wrong as committing fraud in the first place.

  • not silent
    Posted: Fri, 12/04/2020 05:09 pm

    For Cyborg, thank you for providing quotes from your links.  That was very helpful.

    Since the quotes you provided seem to indicate very serious allegations, like Tim Miller, I'm wondering why they are being presented on Hanity and via YouTube instead of in court. Here's the thing: While a YouTube video or TV interview can be very compelling, the person speaking is not under oath (i.e., they will not face perjury charges if what they say is untrue, inaccurate, or exaggerated); it's not in a court room (so "hearsay" evidence can be presented as if it were fact); and the speaker is not subject to cross examination. In our courts, people are presumed innocent until proven guilty; but, on social media, there is almost zero grace-and very little accountability.  

    If half of the allegations we have heard are true, then it seems to me to indicate that our entire country and system of government is in serious trouble-in fact, we are one of the most corrupt nations in the entire world.  If Mr. Trump couldn't stop or prevent such massive corruption despite being president and appointing numerous judges (I.e., if the nation which is supposed to be a light to the world for truth and democracy is this corrupt), what does that say about our whole reason for existence and identity as a nation? Is democracy itself this flawed?   

    Thankfully, I'm not convinced things are that bad; and I won't be until these terrible allegations can be proven in court.  Despite it not being heaven (and, therefore, having SOME corruption), I think our sytem works most of the time and is still one of the best in the world.  However, I will keep seeking the Lord and asking him to intervene on behalf of our leaders and our nation, to expose all corruption and deceit, and to bring the full truth to light.    

  • Cyborg3's picture
    Cyborg3
    Posted: Sat, 12/05/2020 09:44 am

    The Amistad Project part of the Thomas Moore Society is an effort by the nonprofit group to go after voter fraud. There work helped bring about the press conference highlighting the vast amount of voter fraud happening in the swing states and others. This group is doing amazing to bring out the voter fraud and now they are reporting it to the FBI. I sure wish World Magazine would report on their efforts and this organization! 

  • not silent
    Posted: Sat, 12/05/2020 01:53 pm

    Thanks for the info.  I went on the Thomas More Society website but didn't see anything about this case regarding voter fraud even on their "current cases" page.  If this case is so new and ongoing that it's not listed in current cases on the Thomas More Society webpage (though there have been some press releases), then surely World can be excused for not giving it extensive coverage yet!  Since any findings and/or decisions made by the FBI based on this info would be important and significant, I feel sure they will be reported by World and other outlets.     

    I appreciate your participation in these forums, even though we don't always see eye to eye politically.  But I think we can agree with the importance of ongoing prayer asking God to intervene in our country and give guidance and direction to our leaders, to expose any lies and/or corruption, and to give us as believers wisdom in these trying times.

  • Cyborg3's picture
    Cyborg3
    Posted: Sun, 12/06/2020 09:19 am

    I might have got a bad link but here is a video covering their news conference that explains what they are doing.

     

  • Cyborg3's picture
    Cyborg3
    Posted: Mon, 12/07/2020 01:26 am

    This is a great monologue by Jeanine Pirro. She calls out Barr's unusual statement about there being no significant election fraud to overturn the election.

ADVERTISEMENT