Skip to main content

Features

Rapid response

Trail Life USA acts quickly to fill the void left by a changed Boy Scouts of America

Rapid response

TRAIL HEAD: Commemorative patch for kickoff event. (Nyk + Cali Photography )

NASHVILLE, Tenn.—More than 1,200 mostly male voices sang the rousing hymn “In Christ Alone” to kick off the first meeting on Sept. 7 of Trail Life USA, a new group that hopes to be a Christian alternative to the Boy Scouts of America (BSA).

Organizers of the event intentionally chose that “modern hymn,” written by contemporary Christian artists Keith Getty and Stuart Townend, but reflecting ancient Christian theology, to symbolize the differences between Trail Life USA and the Boy Scouts.

“We’re here to honor the legacy of the Boy Scouts of America,” radio personality Bill Bunkley, master of ceremonies for the event, told the crowd after the singing was done. “But now, quite frankly, we are called in a new direction.”  

The crowd at the Music City Sheraton came from 44 states to form what organizers say will be an outdoor scouting-like program designed for boys ages 5-17. The group will focus on “adventure, character and leadership.” The Boy Scout Motto of “Be Prepared” is replaced with the biblical admonition to “Walk Worthy.” Boys of all faiths are welcome, but adults must sign a statement of faith.

This meeting was a rapid response to what founder John Stemberger called the “rapid deterioration” of the Boy Scouts of America from one of America’s most trusted institutions to one to which “we no longer feel safe sending our boys and young men.”

That deterioration in trust reached a tipping point in May, when about 1,400 delegates to the BSA’s annual meeting near Dallas voted to allow openly homosexual boys as members. More than 60 percent of the delegates voted for the proposal. In fact, it was the overwhelming majority that contributed to Stemberger’s sense that the Boy Scouts could no longer be trusted. Just months earlier, a survey of BSA’s membership found that nearly 60 percent believed the current policy, which prohibited homosexual members, was the best policy for the Boy Scouts.  

“It’s stunning to me that in less than six months they would completely reverse their position on what’s in the best interest of boys,” Stemberger said. Stemberger said the change would not have happened if the Boy Scouts had not intentionally withheld information about the negative consequences of the policy change.  

However it happened, the policy changed, and Stemberger and others swung immediately into action. Even before leaving Dallas, Stemberger announced he would convene a group on June 29 in Louisville, Ky., to “discuss the creation of a new character development organization for boys.” Stemberger said the meeting would be a “national coalition meeting of former BSA parents and other youth leaders who wish to return to truly timeless values that once made the BSA great.”

Between that meeting in Louisville and the inaugural meeting of Trail Life USA in Nashville, barely two months elapsed. In that time, the group created a constitution and bylaws, logo, and other organizing documents and procedures. According to Mark Hancock, vice chairman of the board and the convention host, “For this to happen in 68 days, that doesn’t happen by the power of men.”

While Trail Life USA was a-birthing, the Boy Scouts of America continued to show signs of deterioration. Immediately following the May vote, conservative Scout leaders and the churches that sponsor, or “charter,” Scout units, started to defect. The Scouts won’t say how many, and it likely won’t know until units recharter for the new year, but before the May vote, its own estimates were that around 300,000 members would leave because of the decision.

In June, delegates to the Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution expressing “opposition to and disappointment in” the Boy Scouts, though the resolution stopped short of encouraging churches to withdraw. It did say, though, that the actions of the BSA could be a “first step in a process that will fundamentally change the BSA,” putting “the Scouts at odds with a consistent biblical worldview on matters of human sexuality.” 

Among the high-profile Southern Baptist churches who have quit Scouting is Roswell Street Baptist Church, a megachurch in Marietta, Ga. Birmingham’s Briarwood Presbyterian Church, considered by some the “mother church” of the Presbyterian Church in America, has also severed ties with the BSA. 

Staff members for BSA also are defecting. A notable example: Richard Mathews, former general counsel for the Boy Scouts, is now a legal consultant for Trail Life USA.

Another sign of Scouting’s decline came in July when the Scouts held their National Jamboree at the new 10,000-acre Summit Bechtel Reserve in West Virginia. Attendance (including staff) was about 36,600, down nearly 15 percent from the last Jamboree in 2010.

Membership declines will no doubt increase financial pressures. Massive cost overruns at Summit Bechtel Reserve have turned a project originally budgeted for around $150 million into one that will likely exceed $500 million by the end of 2014. 

These pressures forced Chief Scout Executive Wayne Brock, the highest ranking professional Scouter, to announce in August the Scouts would raise dues 60 percent beginning Jan. 1, 2014. Currently, annual dues are $15 per Scout. The dues will rise to $24 next year. Brock also said this was the first dues increase since 2010. BSA spokesman Deron Smith said “technology” and “insurance” had also increased the “cost of doing business.”  

Reporting by WORLD and other news organizations indicates that salaries of senior executives also played a role in the increased costs. According to the Reuters news service, spending on salaries, insurance, and programs by the national headquarters nearly doubled between 2003 and 2012. By 2011, the average compensation of the top five BSA employees had ballooned to $696,862.  

Whatever the causes, the timing of this dues increase could hardly be worse for the Boy Scouts. The dues increase is also sure to hurt the BSA’s back-to-school recruiting efforts, called the “Fall Round-Up,” which takes place in most cities around the country in September.

Brock asserted in his announcement that, despite the dues increase, “the Boy Scouts of America maintains a strong financial position.”  It’s hard to say, though, how long that will last given current trends. Some local councils are barely solvent. The Los Angeles Council, for example, ran a deficit of $3.25 million in 2011, and since 2001 has lost more than $13 million, according to a Reuters investigation.  

The question many inside and outside the Scouting movement have is this: What’s next for the Boy Scouts? Will it eventually allow homosexual leaders? How far down the slippery slope will it go?

“Frankly, we feel like the membership decision is a first step,” said Steve Lemke, provost at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary who chaired the Resolutions Committee. “Our concern is about the direction and the orientation, the trajectory of the Boy Scouts. They seem to be going in a way that politicizes the whole membership question. It also brings a sexual dimension that wasn’t there before.”

While conservative Christians are leaving Scouting, liberal voices are becoming bolder. In June, Caterpillar Corporation announced it would stop giving money to the Scouts because the new policy had not gone far enough. The incoming president of the BSA, the top volunteer leader in Scouting, is Randall Stephenson, CEO of telecommunications giant AT&T. He has long been on the record as being in favor of homosexual leadership for the BSA. In 2012, he told the Dallas Voice, a gay newspaper, that he was committed to changing the policy.

Despite these developments, or perhaps because of them, Stemberger insisted that Trail Life USA is “not an anti-BSA organization. We’re not an anti-anything organization. We honor the legacy of the Boy Scouts of America and the contributions it has made to us and our families. The men and boys we have left behind are not our opponents. They are our brothers and our friends. I encourage you to interact with them with charity and good faith.”  

But, he added, “many of us feel anger and betrayal.” He said charity requires him to “continue to expose the real dangers and risks that the new membership policy poses to boys. Real men value integrity over institutions.”

Warren Cole Smith

Warren Cole Smith

Warren is president of MinistryWatch and the host of WORLD Radio’s Listening In. Follow Warren on Twitter @WarrenColeSmith.

Comments

You must be a WORLD Member and be logged in to the website to comment.
  • Wilebo's picture
    Wilebo
    Posted: Mon, 04/11/2016 04:37 pm

    Diocletian first remove Christianity from the military, then infiltrated the church itself. This is part of an assault on religious liberty. The freedom not only to worship, but to practice your faith.

  • Wilebo's picture
    Wilebo
    Posted: Mon, 04/11/2016 04:37 pm

    "Gvie me your children and in 10 years I will change society"  Adolph Hitler. Francis Schaeffer explained the process of degeneration in "How should we then live". Individuals have failed to see the sex scandals of the Catholic church and Scouting were committed mostly by homosexuals. Yes there are incidents of heterosexual assault, but that seemed to be rare until the sexual revolution.

  • Michael
    Posted: Mon, 04/11/2016 04:37 pm

    William,They have many allies, and they are the "point of the spear" for many other areas of liberal concern, including radical feminism.  Anything that is against the God of the Bible will find homosexuals in active leadership positions.

  • William H
    Posted: Mon, 04/11/2016 04:37 pm

    It is truly mind boggling that a segment of society that is supposedly in the neighborhood of 3% can wield so much power in so many areas.

  • Michael
    Posted: Mon, 04/11/2016 04:37 pm

    This whole affair is an example of homosexual "scorched earth" policy.  Some years ago when they lost the Supreme Court decision that allowed the Scouts to define their own membership rules and exclude homosexuals, they decided to continue their harassment of the Scouts by convincing sponsoring organizations to exclude the Scouts.  If homosexuals can't have things their way, they retaliate by doing their best to destroy whatever is left-- it is a vindictive scorched earth policy that the Scouts were fools to give in to. Now that the Scouts have caved, their organization is crumbling (predictably), but the homosexuals couldn't care less--their concern was never about Scout goals, only about Scout bodies.